Release operational capacity
Estimate time that coordinated digital workflows could return to care and program teams.
Value estimator
Model linked digital uptake, administrative capacity and recovered follow-ups. Compare local economics and qualified global study evidence without signing up.
Choose your organisation type and annual patient volume.
Review cohort assumptions, scenarios and optional local economics.
Print a personalised summary for your leadership or budget review.
Build the business case
Start with the workflows that consume time today, then model a directional opportunity using your own operating inputs.
Estimate time that coordinated digital workflows could return to care and program teams.
Explore the potential effect of structured reminders and follow-up on missed interactions.
Model how many patients could move through one trackable digital workflow.
Your modelled opportunity
annual hours after recovered follow-up admin time
additional completed interactions annually
patients reached under the uptake assumption
Digital reach
Annual patients25,000
Digitally reached patients20,000
Workflow-eligible reached patients14,000
Gross administrative hours released4,200
Admin hours used by recovered interactions150
Remaining released hours4,050
Illustrative estimates only. Actual outcomes vary by organization, workflow configuration, adoption and implementation scope.
The model also indicates up to SAR 384,750 in annual capacity value. This is not a savings forecast.
Patients × uptake → eligible workflows × time reduction. Recovered follow-up time is deducted before valuing remaining capacity.
| Scenario | Remaining hours | Recovered interactions |
|---|---|---|
| Conservative | 1,080 | 270 |
| Central | 4,050 | 900 |
| High-opportunity | 10,936.9 | 1,710 |
Scenario ranges are planning assumptions, not study confidence intervals. Custom assumptions apply to the selected scenario only.
Attendance risk ratio 1.14 versus no reminder; 7 trials, 5,841 participants in the SMS/no-reminder comparison.
International outpatient trials. A relative attendance increase, NOT a 14% reduction in missed appointments. Local applicability is unvalidated.
Mean PDC 64.8% versus 50.1% (+14.7 percentage points); 29.2% lower medical costs, excluding biologic/targeted drugs.
Sponsor-funded US observational adalimumab study; 2,268 matched patients. All-cause medical costs exclude biologic/targeted drugs; total cost including those drugs was not significantly lower (p=0.056). Associations, not causal effects. PDC is not the proportion of adherent patients. Supplied PSP report, pp. 4 & 7.
38% lower adjusted direct acute-episode cost in a US randomized trial of 91 adults.
Two-site, selected acute-care population; US costing and clinical selection do not transfer automatically to Saudi home healthcare. Comparator only, not a CareSync effect.
GASTAT Health Status Statistics 2024, report p. 3: self-reported chronic disease among adults aged 15+. Population evidence, not CareSync outcomes.
EY’s 2026 Saudi survey. Self-reported attitudes; external research, not CareSync outcomes.
Brixner et al. (2019), report pp. 4 & 7: mean PDC 64.8% vs 50.1%; 29.2% lower medical costs excluding biologic/targeted drugs. Study-specific, not CareSync results. KSA scenario assumptions are unvalidated.
Saudi prevalence (18.95%, GASTAT 2024) and EY survey attitudes (89% trust; 88% willingness to share) are context only—not uptake, conversion or improvement rates. Brochures describe capabilities, not outcomes.
Staff hours freed from manual coordination and follow-up.
Additional completed follow-ups across patient journeys.
Patients actively engaged through your branded channels.
Estimates are illustrative and based on stated assumptions, not guaranteed outcomes.
Your personalized demo
See how CareSync brings your patients and teams together in a branded experience.
Prefer to talk first?
Chat on WhatsApp